'Bright, color-accurate display. '
'the upper half of the rear of the phone became noticeably hot after just a few minutes of even ordinary use.'
'With decent hardware and a price tag of around ?300, it is a solid phone. '
'The back is plastic, not glass.'
'No standout quality or feature.'
'It is still a phablet sized phone and the screen size is difficult to use one-handed. '
'The phone focuses and snaps quickly, for about a second, while the shot-to-shot times are average - about three to five seconds, depending on the scene, and whether the HDR mode is on or not. '
'Uncomfortable in the hand.'
'The camera has problems in focussing on subjects and is slow as well.'
'Camera is sub-par, sorely lacking in detail.'
'One other pretty rubbish element of the screen is what it's made of.'
'You need to get around the 300ppi mark to get really good sharpness, and the Moto E does better the Xperia E1 despite its larger screen with 256ppi.'
'It’s not a terrible screen but – you guessed it – the Motorola Moto E offers a much better one. '
'It's a looker - compact and stylish'
'We can't see why you'd choose the Xperia M over its rivals'
'Stylish design, Good battery life, Decent speaker quality'
'cheap Android phone is okay, but there are better budget phones'
ReviewGist helps you find the best products to buy by making sense of online reviews.
We are currently aggregating 369,008 reviews
covering over 29,115 products. See what the press says about ReviewGist here.
Try 'Mobile Finder' - Android App by ReviewGist.
© 2007-15 ReviewGist.com. All Rights Reserved.