'Competition now stronger.'
'Easy-to-use OS. Great call quality.'
'Fairly poor display'
'TN screen is ugly.'
'Rubbish battery life.'
'The screen is a 4-inch 480x800-pixel panel which really isn't very bright and has poor viewing angles. '
A new entry to the budget smartphone category that could scare rivals
One of the best low-cost smartphones you can buy
'Camera is sub-par, sorely lacking in detail.'
'One other pretty rubbish element of the screen is what it's made of.'
'You need to get around the 300ppi mark to get really good sharpness, and the Moto E does better the Xperia E1 despite its larger screen with 256ppi.'
'It’s not a terrible screen but – you guessed it – the Motorola Moto E offers a much better one. '
'No front-facing camera'
'Weak performance.'
'The ugly UI doesn't help much with the user experience either. '
'Poor performance and responsiveness.'
'There's no mistaking the Acer Liquid Z3 for a premium device.'
'The camera, as with the phone’s screen, suffers from poor colour management, weak image definition and sharpness concerns. '
'The display of our test model is quite bright: up to 355 cd/m².'
Good camera, Vibrant Display, Ergonomic build
'No GPS.'
a budget smartphone in every sense
The Nokia Asha 503 brings a more robust 5MP camera (be it fixed-focus) and 3G to a package we already liked, and that's what we can safely call a good start.
It's a looker - compact and stylish
We can't see why you'd choose the Xperia M over its rivals
Stylish design, Good battery life, Decent speaker quality
cheap Android phone is okay, but there are better budget phones
'It's pretty plain looking, and doesn't stand out among the crowd of slimmer smartphones.'
Pretty fast LTE smartphone (or can be)
Good performance, Low temperatures, Enhanced sound via DTS
'cutsy design'
© 2024 ReviewGist.com. All Rights Reserved.
ReviewGist.com
