Best Cell Phones - GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - all versions Network Type, 233 to 306 ppi Pixel Density

'Basically, Motorola still hasn't figured out how to make good cameras for low-end smartphones. '

'Like its predecessor, camera quality disappoints.'

'The surface is very reflective though and the pixel density isn't helping for sharp images.'

'No standout quality or feature.'

'It is still a phablet sized phone and the screen size is difficult to use one-handed. '

'Hissy earpiece.'

'The back is plastic, not glass.'

'Uncomfortable in the hand.'

'Camera is sub-par, sorely lacking in detail.'

'One other pretty rubbish element of the screen is what it's made of.'

'You need to get around the 300ppi mark to get really good sharpness, and the Moto E does better the Xperia E1 despite its larger screen with 256ppi.'

'It’s not a terrible screen but – you guessed it – the Motorola Moto E offers a much better one. '

'Nokia phones typically look and feel very good for their price, but the Nokia Lumia 1320 arguably doesn't.'

'Sound through the earpiece was harsh and trebly.'

'Very expensive.'

'It is unable to properly display block colours, and is riddled with what looks like moire noise throughout the entire display.'

'A big screen is great if you want to watch a lot of video content and similar but in everyday use the G Flex is cumbersome and unwieldy.'

'Carrier branding and bloatware.'

'While the plastic stands up to knocks and scrapes it has a cheap feel to it with a slippery and shiny texture and a tacky tactile sensation.'