'This is a plain budget phone, so don't expect more than the basics. '
'Competition now stronger.'
'Easy-to-use OS. Great call quality.'
'Fairly poor display'
'TN screen is ugly.'
'Camera is sub-par, sorely lacking in detail.'
'One other pretty rubbish element of the screen is what it's made of.'
'You need to get around the 300ppi mark to get really good sharpness, and the Moto E does better the Xperia E1 despite its larger screen with 256ppi.'
'It’s not a terrible screen but – you guessed it – the Motorola Moto E offers a much better one. '
'No front-facing camera'
'Weak performance.'
'The ugly UI doesn't help much with the user experience either. '
'Poor performance and responsiveness.'
It's a looker - compact and stylish
We can't see why you'd choose the Xperia M over its rivals
Stylish design, Good battery life, Decent speaker quality
cheap Android phone is okay, but there are better budget phones
Good display, Adequate performance
Handy Quick Key, MicroSD support
Camera shutter can be voice activated
Cheap, plastic build, Weak camera
Competitively priced, waterproof, and has 4G LTE capabilities
Cheap, Great battery life, MicroSD slot
Good looking, Colourful design, High quality screen
All things bright and colourful
Good build quality, quite fast
Elegant and compact design
Scaled down design, Android Jelly Bean
Android 4.1 with Samsung TouchWiz UI
Great build and nice design
© 2025 ReviewGist.com. All Rights Reserved.
ReviewGist.com
