Beautiful, streamlined design, great performance
Great color and viewing angles & Sleek design
Nice Wide Viewing Angles With Good Color, Very Thin and Compact
Very good image quality, Accurate color rendition
Poor colour accuracy
Responsive touch screen
Badly needs more processing and graphics power.
Touchscreen is reasonably easy to use
Bright, high-resolution screen
PLS proves itself as a viable alternative to IPS
Good detail at native resolution
Slim, energy efficient, environmentally friendly and, allows for a thinner enclosure.
Well-designed widescreen monitor.
Well-designed and slender display.
Range of power-saving features
Glossy piano black surfaces pick up fingerprints and dust easily
Bright. Energy efficient
Responsive touch controls
'Very elegant an sleek look. '
'nice solid feel'
36W maximum consumption
'Text looked very crisp with and without using Microsoft ClearType.'
'Cheap non-ergonomically designed stand - no height adjustment or portrait mode, quite wobbly. '
'good color accuracy'
'Text on a page of fonts of different sizes looked sharp, even when at a very small (6-point) size.'
'Dull colors at times.'
'Unreal Tournament 3 looked great and had vibrant colours running at a 1920x1080-pixel resolution.'
'Text becomes unreadable and colours wash out when viewing from non-optimum angles, although this is somewhat expected from a TN panel.'
ReviewGist helps you find the best products to buy by making sense of online reviews.
We are currently aggregating 376,500 reviews
covering over 29,474 products.
© 2020 ReviewGist.com. All Rights Reserved.