ReviewGist for Android
Why ReviewGist' recommendations are the Best
Digital Cameras
Camcorders
MP3 Players
Cell Phones
Tablets
Notebooks
Desktops
GPS Devices
Printers
More »
Washers
Wireless Routers
3D Printers
Dryers
Flat Panel TVs
DVD/Blu-ray Players
Home Theatres
Hard Drives
Phones
Projectors
IP Phones
Monitors
Electric Shavers
Irons
Headphones
Ebook Readers
Washers
Wireless Routers
3D Printers
Dryers
Flat Panel TVs
DVD/Blu-ray Players
Home Theatres
Hard Drives
Phones
Projectors
IP Phones
Monitors
Electric Shavers
Irons
Headphones
Ebook Readers
Home
»
Best Flat Panel TVs
»
Compare Flat Panel TVs
Compare Flat Panel TVs
1.
2.
3.
4.
Showing:
Samsung 520DXN vs. Samsung PN C7000
Samsung PN C7000
43
100
ReviewGist
Score
$1,049 - $2,700
.
.
.
.
$1,049 - $2,700
Samsung 520DXN
.
.
.
.
The Reviews Say...
Try hovering over one of the vertical bars in the graph!
Excellent
Good
Average
Neutral
Below Average
Bad
Release Date
Apr 2010
Nov 2008
Contrast Ratio
5000000:1
2000:1
Digital TV Standard
HDTV Television
Flat Panel Type
Plasma TV
LCD TV
LCD Response Time
0.0010 ms
8.0 ms
Screen Size
50.0 inch
52.0 inch
3D-ready
yes
Broadcast Format Displayed
1080p (HDTV), 1080i (HDTV), 720p (HDTV), 480p (EDTV), 480i (SDTV)
1080i (HDTV), 720p (HDTV), 480p (EDTV), 480i (SDTV)
Broadcast Format Supported
1080p (HDTV)
1080i (HDTV), 720p (HDTV)
Built-in Tuner
ATSC, NTSC, QAM
Display Resolution
1920 x 1080 pixels
1920 x 1080 pixels
Rear Input Connectors
Component x 2
Front Input Connectors
WiFi Connection
Built-in WiFi, WiFi Ready
Audio Type
Virtual Surround
Virtual Surround
Picture in Picture
With PIP
With PIP
Popular Comparisons
Samsung PN C7000 vs. Samsung UN C7000
Samsung 63" PN63B550 vs. Samsung PN C7000
HP LP3065 vs. Samsung PN C7000
Samsung A630 vs. Samsung PN C7000
Samsung LED UN46B8000 46 vs. Samsung PN C7000
Samsung PN C7000 vs. LG LX6500
Samsung LCD 2333HD vs. Samsung PN C7000
Mitsubishi WD-60738 vs. Samsung PN C7000
Vizio XVT553SV vs. Samsung PN C7000
Samsung LN B360 vs. Samsung PN C7000 vs. Proscan LED30QA
Did you like this page?
Sponsors
feedback