Best Cell Phones - 158 to 32768 MB Installed Memory, 114 to 246 ppi Pixel Density, Under $200

'Basically, Motorola still hasn't figured out how to make good cameras for low-end smartphones. '

'Like its predecessor, camera quality disappoints.'

'The surface is very reflective though and the pixel density isn't helping for sharp images.'

'The Xperia E4g looks odd with the cover off.'

'The screen disappoints next to the best Android phones at the price, but otherwise this is a likeable phone for those on a budget.'

'As a low-end phone, things are quite basic with an LED-less rear camera, a rear-facing mono speaker and a microUSB charging port at the bottom. '

'Competition now stronger.'

'Fairly poor display'

'TN screen is ugly.'

'Rubbish battery life.'

'The screen is a 4-inch 480x800-pixel panel which really isn't very bright and has poor viewing angles. '

'Camera is sub-par, sorely lacking in detail.'

'One other pretty rubbish element of the screen is what it's made of.'

'You need to get around the 300ppi mark to get really good sharpness, and the Moto E does better the Xperia E1 despite its larger screen with 256ppi.'

'It’s not a terrible screen but – you guessed it – the Motorola Moto E offers a much better one. '

'No front-facing camera'

'Weak performance.'

'The ugly UI doesn't help much with the user experience either. '

'Poor performance and responsiveness.'

'Bad. Gesture interface is problematic.'