'Camera is sub-par, sorely lacking in detail.'
'One other pretty rubbish element of the screen is what it's made of.'
'You need to get around the 300ppi mark to get really good sharpness, and the Moto E does better the Xperia E1 despite its larger screen with 256ppi.'
'It’s not a terrible screen but – you guessed it – the Motorola Moto E offers a much better one. '
'No front-facing camera'
'Weak performance.'
'The ugly UI doesn't help much with the user experience either. '
'Poor performance and responsiveness.'
$300 price tag its wallet-friendly for an unlocked phone
Largest display in a Nokia Lumia phone so far
Good value, Decent performance
4G smartphone on a budget
Likeable design, Great screen quality
Slick OS, Good camera, Attractive design
Offers good performance and specifications
Great design and build quality, feels great in the hand
Competitively priced, waterproof, and has 4G LTE capabilities
Thin and light for a mid-range device
High-contrast AMOLED screen, Smooth user interface
Has almost all the features of its last flagship Galaxy S III
Jelly Bean out of the box
Cheap, Great battery life, MicroSD slot
Good looking, Colourful design, High quality screen
All things bright and colourful
Good build quality, quite fast
Solid construction
Snappy performance
Pleasing ClearBlack AMOLED display
Good exclusive apps, namely Data Sense
'Slick HDMI mirroring.'
'Superb build quality.'
'crisp text'
'commendable build quality'
User-friendly interface option for first-time smartphone users
Android Ice Cream Sandwich
Good talk time. Inexpensive
© 2024 ReviewGist.com. All Rights Reserved.
ReviewGist.com
