'Competition now stronger.'
'Easy-to-use OS. Great call quality.'
'Fairly poor display'
'TN screen is ugly.'
'Rubbish battery life.'
'The screen is a 4-inch 480x800-pixel panel which really isn't very bright and has poor viewing angles. '
A new entry to the budget smartphone category that could scare rivals
One of the best low-cost smartphones you can buy
'Camera is sub-par, sorely lacking in detail.'
'One other pretty rubbish element of the screen is what it's made of.'
'You need to get around the 300ppi mark to get really good sharpness, and the Moto E does better the Xperia E1 despite its larger screen with 256ppi.'
'It’s not a terrible screen but – you guessed it – the Motorola Moto E offers a much better one. '
'No front-facing camera'
'Weak performance.'
'The ugly UI doesn't help much with the user experience either. '
'Poor performance and responsiveness.'
It's a looker - compact and stylish
We can't see why you'd choose the Xperia M over its rivals
Stylish design, Good battery life, Decent speaker quality
cheap Android phone is okay, but there are better budget phones
'It's pretty plain looking, and doesn't stand out among the crowd of slimmer smartphones.'
Pretty fast LTE smartphone (or can be)
Good picture quality
Supports 4G, MicroSD card support, Clean user interface
Inconsistent performance, Unimaginative design
Low price, 4G connectivity, microSD card slot, runs Android 4.2
Can take a bath, but not a beating
© 2025 ReviewGist.com. All Rights Reserved.
ReviewGist.com
