Best Monitors - 280 to 400 cd/m^2 Brightness, C-Tick Regulatory Approval, 7 to 15 ms Response Time

'the colors looked dull.'

'Colours are dull.'

'one of the most awkward cable management systems I've tested'

'less accurate – display'

'Colors seemed slightly bland and muted, though some hues in a photo of a fruit tart looked realistic.'

'The buttons are also quite small and spaced close together, which led us to frequently pressing the wrong button by mistake'

'priced higher than competing 20-inch wide-screen LCDs.'

'the picture appeared slightly soft.'

'It isn't the easiest menu system to use,'

'Banding is clearly evident in colour gradients and compression artefacts are all too visable during video playback.'

'I ended up having to prop the display up on a couple of large books to achieve the best height for my eyes.'

'difficult-to-use on-screen menu system'

'The panel is fixed at 3.5 inches above the desk, which is pretty low for the average user; we prefer a minimum of 4 inches,'

'Its performance on DVDs and games was average, as was its image quality when displaying basic Web and productivity-application material, but it really stumbled on CNET Labs' DisplayMate-based grayscale and color tests .'

'Two new, small projections extend backwards from the original feet, giving the entire stand an uneven X shape.'